The Sexist Texas Lege

The war on women continues on many fronts


Anti-choice male conservative legislators showed their true colors at every turn during this year's legislative session. Sen. Don Huf­fines, R-Dallas, refused to agree that women deserve bodily autonomy as a protected right. Rep. Jonathan Stickland, R-Bedford, requested a female parliamentarian "smile for us" on the House floor. In an effort to silence a pro-choice woman testifying before the Senate, Charles Schwertner, R-George­town, gaveled a table so forcefully that he shattered the glass top. And that's just what we saw and heard publicly. Women at the Capitol are regular victims of sexual harassment, including unwanted kissing, groping, and lewd remarks, as outlets like the Texas Tribune and the Daily Beast have recently reported. The revelations, which mirror many of those being unearthed this year among celebrities and political predators, have instigated dialogue about the Legislature's weak and outdated sexual harassment policies, compelling them to update their reporting standards.

Legislators didn't just act like sexist blowhards this session; they helped codify that misogyny. Their crowning achievement was Senate Bill 8, a package law restricting abortion access. Abortion providers including Planned Parenthood and Whole Woman's Health swiftly took Texas to court over one especially insidious provision within SB 8 – a rule banning dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion, even in cases of rape or incest. Criminalizing D&E, the most common and safest procedure at the second trimester (around 12-15 weeks) would force women into invasive and riskier medical procedures, plaintiffs argued in court. In a November victory for providers, U.S. Judge Lee Yeakel found the law to be an "undue burden" on women. (That trial remains ongoing as the state has appealed to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.)

Overall, it's been an especially litigious year for women's health care; 2017 saw a total of three reproductive rights-related federal court rulings, all decided in favor of abortion providers by Republican-appointed judges based in Austin, no less. U.S. Judge Sam Sparks blunted the state's effort to revoke Medicaid funds from Planned Parent­hood, finding the state provided no real evidence of any wrongdoing by the health care provider. Sparks also struck down a law requiring the burial or cremation of fetal tissue, calling it a "pretext" to restrict abortion, but legislators went ahead and tucked a nearly identical provision into SB 8. (Expect more litigation on that one.) That stunning and shameless lack of evidence, and failure to show that their laws actually consider the health and safety of women, seemed to not work out so well at that place we call the U.S. Supreme Court, but for some reason lawmakers have kept at it. It's as though they don't really respect or see women as people. ... Wonder where they got a crazy idea like that.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

Read more of the Chronicle's decades of reproductive rights reporting here.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More 85th Lege
Lege Lines: Sine Done
Lege Lines: Sine Done
The dregs from last month’s special session

Richard Whittaker, Aug. 25, 2017

Looking at the Lege After a Flaccid Special Session
Looking at the Lege After a Flaccid Special Session
Alpha males Abbott and Patrick can't get their red meat passed

the News Staff, Aug. 18, 2017

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 1, 2021

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

85th Lege, Don Huffines, Jonathan Stickland, Charles Schwertner, Lee Yeakel, reproductive rights

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle