Opposition to Social Security 'No Match' Letters Mounting
Activists take action against Department of Homeland Security plans to turn Social Security 'no match' letters into a vehicle for immigration enforcement
By Cheryl Smith, Fri., Sept. 21, 2007
In Austin, the Workers Defense Project, one of several local groups making up the Austin Immigrant Rights Coalition, focused on the regional Social Security office in Dallas – which serves all of Texas, as well as Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Oklahoma – attempting to overwhelm it with phone messages and other anti-"no match" communiqués. The Workers Defense Project is carrying out the "flooding" with Houston, New Orleans, and Little Rock, Ark., affiliates of Interfaith Worker Justice, a Chicago-based "network of people of faith" that, according to its website, advocates nationwide for low-wage workers. According to Democracy Now!'s report, up until recently, "no match" letters "were used to notify employees of the benefits they could lose as a result of the discrepancy." The new letters, however, obligate employers either to fix a Social Security data discrepancy in 90 days or fire the worker.
"It's not [an] employer's job to regulate migration," said WDP Director Cristina Tzintzún, who also noted that in addition to affecting undocumented immigrants, "no match" letters adversely impact U.S. citizens who have married or changed their names, as well as Latino citizens, since the largest chunk of undocumented workers in the U.S. comes from Latin America. (According to the 2006-2007 Travis Co. Immigrant Assessment report, 17% of Travis County's population is foreign-born; an unknown chunk of that number is undocumented.) DHS spokeswoman Laura Keehner said the letters aren't intended to adversely affect any of the above groups of people. Their purpose is to remind employers of the consequences of hiring undocumented workers, she said.
A San Francisco judge ordered in August "a temporary stay on sending out new versions of the letters," Democracy Now! reports, also noting that a related Oct. 1 hearing is scheduled.
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.