Naked City
Save Our Taxpayers Disputes ACC Annexation Vote
By Rachel Proctor May, Fri., April 1, 2005
Save Our Taxpayers asked the DOJ to investigate the election first on the grounds that it violates the Voting Rights Act by diluting minority representation most of the annexed areas are majority-white. Second, they say the board couldn't have issued the election order in time to meet the March 7 filing deadline, because the board of trustees didn't meet until 6pm.
As for the first, ACC says it already got Voting Rights Act clearance from the DOJ, and that the annexation would increase the Anglo percentage of the district minimally, from 54% to 55.7%. Second, they argue that the trustees had until midnight on March 7 to issue the election order, a deadline they met.
Finally, Save Our Taxpayers argues that allowing all of Austin to decide the taxing future of a small minority violates constitutional principles and the spirit of democracy. A fair election, they say, would be one in which only those voters who would be affected by a tax increase would vote on the issue. In fact, a bill in the Legislature would require all future annexation elections to be held in just this way, and Save Our Taxpayers charges that ACC is simply trying to ram the referendum through before it becomes illegal.
On the other hand, Hunter Ellinger, who serves on the college's advisory committee of finance and budget, points out that ACC subsidizes tuition for out-of-district students even though such students pay about twice as much as students living within ACC's taxing district, their tuition still doesn't cover the cost of educating them without also getting property taxes from their neighborhoods. "When areas are getting services they're not paying for, it's not really appropriate for them to say they're being put-upon when they're asked to pay for them," he said.
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.