Naked City
Public Ed: What's Equal?
By Michael King, Fri., July 4, 2003
The size of the committee will create logistical problems (but political advantages) when the panel has to come to terms with whatever plan comes out of the Senate. Early testimony has been focused on whether the Texas Constitution requires every student to be provided an "equitable" or only an "adequate" education -- and if the latter, what amount of money can be defined as delivering "adequacy." Since some districts get by on roughly $4,500 per student, the committee leadership is suggesting that might be a good baseline to define "adequacy." Yet simultaneously, wealthy suburban districts subject to recapture (and therefore suing the state) are complaining that their schools can't possibly be expected to survive on nearly twice that much, up to $8,500 per student -- they want both lower property taxes and more money for their own kids.
Whatever system the committee comes up with, the comptroller's office testified that without more money, it's unlikely to work -- and to get more money will require a revision of the entire state-tax system, which currently survives on sales taxes, property taxes, lottery taxes, and chicken wire. The committee's next meetings are July 15 and 16.
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.