Naked City
Bikes vs. Cars at CAMPO
By Lauri Apple, Fri., May 23, 2003
"We take the credit or the blame" for the funding recommendation and the resulting outcry, Aulick says. But air quality is a critical issue, he adds. If the Austin metro area doesn't reduce air pollution enough to avoid nonattainment of federal air-quality standards, CAMPO -- which has to approve the allocation of federal transportation funds -- could lose access to all federal highway dollars.
Even if the CAMPO board sympathizes with cyclists and votes to keep the funding system intact, says city bicycle/pedestrian program coordinator Linda DuPriest, the fact that staff recommended opening up bike/ped funds to road projects is "really, really demoralizing. [CAMPO] is supposed to be multimodal." Although Austin voters approved bonds in 1998 and 2000 to set aside local money for bike/ped projects, the city wouldn't be able to leverage those bonds with federal funds if the STP 4C money is diverted to intersections and traffic lights.
In the last decade, CAMPO has allocated $18.6 million to bike/ped programs and projects -- almost $11 million to the city of Austin alone. Local projects that have benefited from the STP 4C funds include the Pfluger Bridge, bicycle lanes on Pleasant Valley and Oltorf, and sidewalk projects in East Austin. If the board does vote to open the funding to auto-oriented improvements, Aulick says, their decision won't affect any projects or programs until fiscal 2005.
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.