Austin Energy Budget

A summary comparison of Austin Energy's current and recent budgets


Figures represent: FY2003 proposed (in millions) / Change from FY02 budget / Change from FY02 actual

Expenses: $448.6

General: O&M $370.2 / -1.0% / 16.9%

Other operating: $44.3 / 8.0% / -6.4%

Conservation: $22.2 / -22.7% / 15.0%

Support expenses: $11.9 / 28.9% / 26.7% (Mostly administrative)

Transfers out: $380.5

Debt service: $185.9 / 3.0% / 4.3%

Electric CIP: $117.0 / -12.8% / -12.0% (Pay as you go capital projects)

General Fund: $72.9 / 5.7% / 5.7%

Econ. Dev. Fund: $3.5 / -0.3% / -0.3% (Redevelopment Services Office)

Other transfers: $1.2 / 10.4% / 10.4%

Debt Mgmt. Fund: $ 0 / -100.0% / -100.0% (FY02: $7.6 million; Total DMF: $181 million)

Total expenditures: $829.1 / -2.3% / 5.6%

Revenue/transfers in: $815.4 / -2.7% / 4.7%

Beginning balance: $101.5 / -6.0% / -6.0%

Surplus/shortfall: -$13.7 / 23.8% / 112.5%

Ending balance: $87.8 / -9.4% / -13.5%

Austin Energy is, by a wide margin, the city's largest department, with annual expenditures of close to $830 million -- 45% of the total city budget. Only half of that spending goes to actual operations; 22% goes to service AE's sizable debt, 14% goes to pay-as-you-go capital projects, and more than 9% goes to support the General Fund, as well as to pay for the city's Economic Growth and Redevelopment Services office. (The AE transfer makes up 16% of the General Fund.) As with the rest of city government, AE's revenue isn't covering its expenses (rates haven't increased in eight years); even after eliminating the transfer of "excess cash" to the Debt Management Fund, AE will dip into its ending balance by nearly $14 million in the proposed FY03 budget, more than double the shortfall expected for this year. This puts AE, at least technically, out of compliance with city financial policies -- which say that electric rates should be high enough to cover all of these line items.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

  • More of the Story

  • Savings or Slush?

    In a tight budget year, Austin Energy's debt management fund is under scrutiny.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More by Mike Clark-Madison
Austin at Large: Back (and Forth) to the Future
Austin at Large: Back (and Forth) to the Future
At some point Austin history will stop looping upon itself. Until next time …

March 17, 2023

Austin at Large: The Train Can’t Be Too Late
Austin at Large: The Train Can’t Be Too Late
It’s going to be sad, so sad, when Mayor Pete’s money comes if Austin’s not ready

March 10, 2023

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Austin Energy, utility budget, city budget

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle