Brush Off Your Shakespeare

Friends, countrymen... Welcome to Film Fight

Yeah, we're gonna be seeing a lot of this guy.
Yeah, we're gonna be seeing a lot of this guy.

I’d like to wish you all a good morning, but to be honest, “good morrow” leapt to mind first. That's because I’ve been ingesting a steady diet of Shakespeare for three weeks’ straight and my brain is now unconsciously spitting out words like "thither" and "nonny" and "bonny" and "strumpet." (It sounds like an annoyance, I know, but I'm kind of loving it. My conversation companions, maybe not so much.)

So why so much Shakespeare? Because my colleague Josh Rosenblatt and I are endeavoring in this, our second Film Fight, to take on film adaptations of the Bard. If you want to know more about this crazy thing called Film Fight – about the rules of engagement and the Happy Hour we’re hosting next week at Spider Housego here. And, as always, we'd love to hear back from you, dear reader, and the added incentive is that registered commenters are eligible to win prizes.

So let's dive right in, shall we? For those of you who were with us for the first Film Fight, you’ll remember that Josh and I tend to keep different hours. So I’m gonna toss a few posts out into the ether this morning, Josh will respond in the afternoon, and then we’ll both do some typing tonight.

There's a lot to tackle here, and Josh and I previously agreed to focus today's posts on old versus new adaptations – all of which retain the original language of the Bard (we'll get to works simply inspired by Shakespeare tomorrow).

To be more specific, Josh will be defending the classical/traditional adaptations (everything up to and including Polanski’s Macbeth), while I'll be singing the praises of the contemporary adaptations, many of which rather radically reimagine the text – Julie Taymor’s Titus, for instance, which grab-bags Studio 54, video-game culture, ancient Rome, and Fascist Italy. (Fascism's big with the recontextualizing crowd – see also Branagh's Love's Labour's Lost and the Ian McKellen-starring Richard III.)

I'm gonna get some coffee in my system and then we'll get straight to the film I think we've both been itching to talk about – for very different reasons – since we first set out to do Shakespeare: Baz Luhrman's Romeo + Juliet. I suspect there will be a lot of biting of thumbs at each other, which is just as it should be.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Shakespeare on Film
Last Day to Vote
Last Day to Vote
Last day to vote, plus the Film Fight Happy Hour deets

Kimberley Jones, Aug. 27, 2008

Rock Me Sexy Shakespeare?
Rock Me Sexy Shakespeare?
Hamlet 2 didn't give us fresh legs

Kimberley Jones, Aug. 22, 2008

More by Kimberley Jones
Movies, Mothers, and 4th of July Fun Highlights the Week's Events
Movies, Mothers, and 4th of July Fun Highlights the Week's Events
Make your holiday weekday worth it

June 28, 2024

Robot Dreams
Dog and Robot find companionship in this lovely and touching Oscar-nominated animated film

June 14, 2024

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

Shakespeare on Film

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle