Planned Parenthood Fights Texas in Court to Save Medicaid

Providers say Medicaid exclusion would be "devastating"

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas CEO Ken Lambrecht
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas CEO Ken Lambrecht (Photo by Jana Birchum)

Planned Parenthood affiliates are in court this week to halt state officials’ plans to boot the provider from Medicaid, as promised last month.

The state has largely based its termination of healthcare for thousands of low-income women on a set of widely discredited undercover videos released by anti-choice group the Center for Medical Progress, which failed to show PP profits from aborted fetal tissue.

The three-day hearing in U.S. Judge Sam Sparks’ federal courtroom began Tuesday (Jan. 17) with Planned Parenthood leaders of Texas stressing that the Medicaid exclusion would have a “devastating” and “damaging” impact on patients and prevent its core mission of helping the “poorest of the poor” women and men of the state get access to birth control, HIV and cancer screenings, STD tests, and other basic preventative care. The rule would strip them of the $3.1 million needed to aid 11,000 women, including 4,000 in Austin, Dallas, Ft. Worth, Waco, Tyler and surrounding areas. As a result, clinics would reduce hours, staff, and some may possibly shut down.

“We serve among the most vulnerable,” said Ken Lambrecht, CEO of Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas, which includes Austin. “And my fear is that they won’t know where to turn, I’ve already heard concern from patients because there’s not much elsewhere to go … [Removing Medicaid] is unconscionable.”

On Tuesday, state attorneys attempted to show CMP video clips in court, but didn’t get far after Sparks agreed to their irrelevance, even calling the effort “baloney.” Melissa Farrell, research director at Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, the only affiliate featured on the video, called the footage “misleading,” and debunked state claims that the provider had ever engaged in profit from fetal tissue or that any abortion procedures had been influenced by fetal tissue donation. “If we were attempting to profit, our model would be very different,” said Farrell.

By questioning their grants and financial statements, state attorneys sought to suggest Planned Parenthood could financially handle a loss of Medicaid funds, to which an impatient Sparks interjected, “I think you’re wasting my time.”

The trial is expected to continue through Thursday, Jan. 19. An exclusion is set to take effect on Saturday, but Sparks signaled he will likely rule on whether or not to issue a temporary injunction Friday. Check back here for additional coverage.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

Read more of the Chronicle's decades of reproductive rights reporting here.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More abortion rights
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Mary Tuma, Nov. 1, 2021

Fifth Circuit Hears Objections to Texas' Fetal Burial Law
Fifth Circuit Hears Objections to Texas' Fetal Burial Law
Anti-abortion measure currently on hold pending appeals

Saskia Henn, Sept. 18, 2019

More Reproductive Rights
Council Recap: Protecting Austinites' Reproductive Rights
Council Recap: Protecting Austinites' Reproductive Rights
Package of measures in response to Dobbs decision

Austin Sanders, July 22, 2022

In Scathing Ruling, Federal Judge Blocks (For Now) Texas Abortion Ban
In Scathing Ruling, Federal Judge Blocks (For Now) Texas Abortion Ban
A temporary injunction for an "offensive deprivation"

Mary Tuma, Oct. 7, 2021

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortions in Texas Fell By Half After Ban, Study Finds
Abortions in Texas Fell By Half After Ban, Study Finds
Displaced patients strain capacity in neighboring states

Oct. 29, 2021

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

abortion rights, Ken Lambrecht, Sam Sparks, Melissa Farrell, reproductive rights

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle